Safe Harbors for our Future: An Overview of Marine Protected Areas.

Rubicon Research Repository/Manakin Repository

Safe Harbors for our Future: An Overview of Marine Protected Areas.

Show simple item record


dc.contributor.author Smith, D
dc.contributor.author Miller, KA
dc.date.accessioned 2007-07-31T02:19:41Z
dc.date.available 2007-07-31T02:19:41Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier.citation D Smith and KA Miller. Safe Harbors for our Future: An Overview of Marine Protected Areas. In: SF Norton (ed). 2003. Diving for Science...2003. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Scientific Diving Symposium, American Academy of Underwater Sciences. Greenville, North Carolina. en
dc.identifier.uri http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org/4759
dc.description American Academy of Underwater Sciences (http://www.aaus.org/) en
dc.description.abstract In the late 1800s and early 1900s, recreational fishers, especially in southern California, began to realize that populations of their favorite gamefish were in decline. Since 1952, 53 marine refuges, sanctuaries and ecological preserves, with varying levels of protection, have been established, totaling 2.2% of state waters. Of these, 10 are no- take reserves (0.2 % of state waters). In 1999, Californians voted to give the California Department of Fish & Game the responsibility for establishing a network of marine protected areas (MPAs) throughout the state. These portions of the coastline are set aside to protect and restore habitats, to conserve biological diversity, to serve as scientific baselines from which to judge future change in ocean ecosystems, to promote recreational and educational activities, and to enhance depleted fisheries. The science and politics of MPAs are hotly contested topics today. Although scientists agree that MPAs are important conservation and management tools, some stakeholders who exploit nearshore marine species for a living or for pleasure are not willing to set aside no-take reserves. The debate over their fairness to these stakeholders and also the efficacy of MPAs can derail or delay their establishment. Similarly, the site location and size of new MPAs depends not only on hydrographic and ecological criteria (the goal is to link reserves via larval dispersal) but also political and socioeconomic considerations. Once MPAs are established, their effect on nearshore marine community structure and on individual species population dynamics, compared to unprotected control sites, must be assessed by a comprehensive yet pragmatic monitoring program. A group of government and university biologists (CRANE) are currently developing state-wide protocols for subtidal monitoring using SCUBA and ROV surveys. Finally, adaptive management of MPAs and conscientious enforcement efforts are essential to the success of the reserve. Now is the time for intensive research to support the establishment of MPAs and demonstrate their efficacy for marine conservation. en
dc.format.extent 268081 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS) en
dc.subject Scientific Diving en
dc.subject marine protected areas en
dc.title Safe Harbors for our Future: An Overview of Marine Protected Areas. en
dc.type Article en

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
AAUS_2003_26.pdf 261.7Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account